Thursday, November 29, 2012
NY court rejects inspector liability in capsizing
AP
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — New York's top court on Thursday rejected damages claims against state inspectors who continually recertified a tour boat for 48-passenger capacity before it overturned on an Adirondack lake in 2005, drowning 20 people on a fall foliage tour.

The Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that the state generally isn't liable for "the negligent performance" of government functions unless it has some "special duty" to those hurt.

Federal investigators afterward said the 40-foot Ethan Allen should have been limited to 14 passengers. The boat tipped over in clear, sunny weather, sending 47 tourists and the captain into Lake George. The National Transportation Safety Board concluded that "insufficient stability," partly from the passenger load, was the probable cause of the accident.

Nineteen of those killed were from Michigan. One was from Ohio.

"Although the law is clear, the upshot is that, regardless of any negligence on the part of the state, the victims of this disastrous wreck are essentially left without adequate remedy," Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman wrote for the unanimous court. "The Legislature currently has a proposal before it to require public vessels to carry marine protection and indemnity insurance. We note that such a requirement — had it existed — might have been able to provide a modicum of relief here."

The six judges noted that the Legislature, even in amending state Navigation Law after the disaster to impose more safety standards, didn't establish a private right to sue the government.

They reversed a midlevel court and upheld the state's claim of sovereign immunity in carrying out these governmental functions.

"The statutory scheme at issue here does require inspectors to issue a certificate of inspection indicating that the vessel is safe and, specifically, certifying the number of passengers the vessel can safety transport," Lippman wrote. "However, these statutory obligations do not create a special duty of care owed by the state to particular passengers."

The top court noted that state inspectors had annually carried forward the passenger capacity of 48 from 1979 to 2005, despite a major modification in 1989 to replace a canvas canopy with wood. They didn't conduct stability tests. Capacity was initially set by the Coast Guard after the boat was built in Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: